Free Estimation Complexity Analyzer
Analyze user story complexity and get suggested story point ranges before your planning session

Ready to Analyze a User Story?
Paste a user story and our AI will break down its complexity factors, flag risks, and suggest a story point range for your planning poker session.
Analyze story complexity before your planning poker session
Estimation sessions go sideways when the team doesn't have a shared understanding of what a story involves. One person sees a simple API change while another sees a full integration with error handling, migration scripts, and monitoring. The resulting spread in story points wastes time and often leads to anchoring on whoever speaks first.
This tool analyzes a user story before your planning poker session and breaks it into concrete complexity factors: dependencies, unknowns, technical risk, scope, and testing effort. Each factor gets a rating with specific reasoning, so your team walks into the estimation meeting with a common starting point instead of guessing from scratch.
Why pre-analysis improves estimation accuracy
Reduce estimation spread
When everyone sees the same complexity breakdown, the gap between the highest and lowest estimates shrinks. You spend less time arguing about what a story involves and more time actually building it.
Surface hidden complexity early
The analysis catches dependencies and technical risks that individual team members might miss. Better to discover these before committing to a sprint.
Focus the conversation
Instead of open-ended "what do you think?" discussions, the team can zero in on the specific factors where they disagree. That kind of focused debate is where the real calibration happens.
Build estimation confidence
New team members and junior developers get to see how experienced estimators break down complexity. Over a few sprints, that shared reasoning helps the whole team get better at sizing work.
How to use complexity analysis in planning poker
This tool works best as preparation, not a replacement for team discussion. Here's how to get the most from it:
1. Run it before the meeting
Share the analysis with your team before the planning poker session. Give people time to read through the factors and form their own opinions before anyone votes.
2. Use factors as discussion anchors
When estimates diverge, look at which complexity factor people weighted differently. Someone rating dependencies as high while others rate it low tells you exactly where to dig deeper.
3. Track accuracy over time
Compare the suggested ranges against your team's actual velocity. After a few sprints, you'll learn where the tool overestimates or underestimates for your specific team and codebase.