📚🌍 Open Knowledge Library

Dive into our OER Books adventure, sharing the chapters of success, the footnotes of challenges, and drafting the next edition for continuous learning.
45–60 min
4-12 people
Based on: What Went Well, What Went Wrong, What We Want to Improve
📚🌍 Open Knowledge Library

Template Columns

📖✨ Bright Pages

Highlight the successful chapters and valuable insights from our open‑resource journey.

Base column: What Went Well
📉⚠️ Torn Pages

Identify the missing links, errors, or setbacks that disrupted our publishing flow.

Base column: What Went Wrong
🛠️📚 Editing Desk

Propose edits, new resources, or processes to enhance our OER collection.

Base column: What We Want to Improve

About this template

A retrospective for OER book projects that celebrates successes, surfaces challenges, and plans concrete improvements.

When to use this template

Use when your team has completed a publishing cycle or major release of open‑resource materials and needs to reflect on outcomes and next steps.

How to facilitate

1

Begin with a brief reminder of the OER project goals and the purpose of this retrospective

2

Ask participants to add sticky notes to the Bright Pages column describing successful chapters, insights, or wins

3

Invite participants to add sticky notes to the Torn Pages column noting missing links, errors, or setbacks encountered

4

Group similar notes in each column and discuss the underlying reasons

5

Move to the Editing Desk column and brainstorm concrete edits, new resources, or process changes to improve future releases

6

Vote on the top three actions, assign owners, and set deadlines before closing

Pro Tips

Encourage anonymous contributions to surface honest feedback

Timebox each column discussion to keep the session focused

Use color‑coded virtual sticky notes to match column themes for visual clarity

FAQ

What if participants are hesitant to share challenges?

Allow anonymous sticky notes and reassure the team that the focus is on process, not blame, which encourages openness.

How do we prioritize actions from the Editing Desk?

Use dot voting or a simple thumbs‑up system to let the team surface the most impactful improvements, then assign owners.

Can this format be used for non‑OER projects?

Yes, the structure works for any knowledge‑creation effort; just rename columns to fit your context.

Want a custom template?

Create a retrospective template tailored to your team's needs with our AI-powered generator

Try AI Template Generator

At a glance

  • Duration

    45–60 min

  • Team Size

    4-12 people

  • Columns

    3 columns

  • Base Format

    What Went Well, What Went Wrong, What We Want to Improve

Tags

open education
knowledge sharing
continuous improvement
team reflection
action planning

Ready to get started?

Use this template to run your next retrospective