🤖❤️💔 AI Love‑Hate Saga

Explore our tangled romance with AI—celebrate the sparks, confront the glitches, and script a smoother partnership for the next sprint.
45–60 min
4-12 people
Based on: What Went Well, What Went Wrong, What We Want to Improve
🤖❤️💔 AI Love‑Hate Saga

Template Columns

💖 Sweet Successes

Highlight the moments where AI felt like a perfect match.

Base column: What Went Well
💔 Glitchy Breakups

Share the frustrations and missteps that made us doubt the relationship.

Base column: What Went Wrong
🔧 Reboot & Refine

Identify actions to nurture trust and improve our AI collaboration.

Base column: What We Want to Improve

About this template

A playful retrospective that examines the highs and lows of working with AI, turning successes into love stories and glitches into growth opportunities.

When to use this template

Use when the team heavily relies on AI tools and wants to reflect on both the benefits and pain points of that partnership.

How to facilitate

1

Set the stage by reminding the group of the purpose: to celebrate AI wins, surface frustrations, and co‑create improvements.

2

Ask participants to silently add sticky notes to the “💖 Sweet Successes” column, describing moments when AI felt like a perfect match.

3

Collect the notes, group similar items, and have the team briefly share each success, noting why it mattered.

4

Repeat the silent brainstorming for the “💔 Glitchy Breakups” column, then discuss each pain point, exploring root causes and emotions.

5

Move to “🔧 Reboot & Refine”, turn the top successes and breakups into concrete actions, assign owners, and set a short‑term experiment for the next sprint.

Pro Tips

Encourage the use of emojis or GIFs on virtual sticky notes to capture the emotional tone of AI interactions.

Limit each discussion to 2‑3 minutes per item to keep energy high and avoid deep dives that stall the session.

Before the retro, gather usage metrics from AI tools to provide data‑driven context for the conversation.

FAQ

What if the team feels uncomfortable sharing negative experiences about AI?

Normalize criticism by framing it as feedback for the partnership, not blame, and remind that every glitch is an opportunity to improve.

How do we turn vague frustrations into actionable items?

Ask the “Reboot & Refine” group to apply the ‘who, what, when’ format, turning each pain point into a specific experiment with an owner and deadline.

Can this retro be used for non‑AI tools?

Yes, the love‑hate framing works for any technology or process where the team experiences strong positives and negatives.

Want a custom template?

Create a retrospective template tailored to your team's needs with our AI-powered generator

Try AI Template Generator

At a glance

  • Duration

    45–60 min

  • Team Size

    4-12 people

  • Columns

    3 columns

  • Base Format

    What Went Well, What Went Wrong, What We Want to Improve

Tags

AI
team health
reflection
action-oriented
technology partnership

Ready to get started?

Use this template to run your next retrospective